Decrease Font Size

Increase Font Size

Your Simple and Affordable Technology

BLOG

Cross-domain policy problem with ASP.NET SilverLight WCF service

19 October 2009 bryiantan (9)

An error occurred while trying to make a request to URI This could be due to attempting to access a service in a cross-domain way without a proper cross-domain policy in place, or a policy that is unsuitable for SOAP services. You may need to contact the owner of the service to publish a cross-domain policy file and to ensure it allows SOAP-related HTTP headers to be sent. This error may also be caused by using internal types in the web service proxy without using the InternalsVisibleToAttribute attribute. Please see the inner exception for more details.
Silverlight WCF Exception
Cross-domain policy problem with WCF service

Solution:
Silverlight clientaccesspolicy.xml files for the Enterprise (Part 1 of 2)
Silverlight Cross Domain Access

Comments (9) -

IT support kent
1/11/2010 6:42:04 PM |

Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that.

Starlight
1/26/2010 5:53:36 AM |

Umm... I think something might have gone wrong on this page. Please fix it so when I check back I can read the same article as the satisfied customer above!

35mm slide scanners
1/27/2010 6:17:47 PM |

Great post!

Greetz

Nick

Google Domain Apps
1/28/2010 3:01:07 PM |

The blog was absolutely fantastic! Lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need!

screen printing printers
2/1/2010 1:15:20 PM |

nice post..

bookkeeper
2/11/2010 6:45:23 PM |

Very useful info. Hope to see more posts soon!
http://ebookkeeper.com.au/

lawyer in california
2/13/2010 5:32:14 AM |

Very inspiring article. I have read that a lot of people were moved by your inspiring post. Thanks for sharing this.

Diane
2/17/2010 12:06:16 AM |

Thanks for the great info. I'll be sure to come back often.

free usb
2/26/2011 9:13:09 PM |

Thanks for the info. The solution worked for me!

Add comment

Name *

E-mail *

Comment *

Preview

Notify me when new comments are added

Tweets about "asp.net"

2009
- June (8)
- July (14)
- August (5)
- September (6)
- October (9)
- November (3)
- December (2)
2010
- January (3)
- February (5)
- March (1)
- May (3)
- June (1)
- July (2)
- August (1)
- September (4)
- October (1)
- December (1)
2011
- January (3)
- February (2)
- June (2)
- August (1)
- September (1)
- October (1)
2012
- March (1)
- April (5)
- May (2)
- June (1)
- July (2)
- September (1)
- December (2)
2013
- February (2)
- June (1)
2015
- November (3)
- December (1)
2016
- March (2)
- July (1)
- December (1)
2017
- January (1)
- February (1)
- April (1)
- June (1)

Recent comments

ASP.NET - Password Strength Indicator using jQuery and XML (3)
kelly wrote: Thanks for sharing this code. I like the simplicit� [More]
SyntaxHighlighter 2.0 Extension For BlogEngine.NET (204)
elanvacations wrote: Nice collection keep it up [More]
Incorrect syntax near PIVOT. See help for the stored procedure sp_dbcmptlevel (5)
Mohsin Hassan wrote: GRet blog ......keep it up [More]
Cross-domain policy problem with ASP.NET SilverLight WCF service (9)
free usb wrote: Thanks for the info. The solution worked for me! [More]
ASP.NET - Password Strength Indicator using jQuery and XML (3)
Komodo Island is the NEW 7 Wonders of The World wrote: that nice article, thanks for share it [More]
Disable an ASP.NET button during PostBack with AJAX loading background image (55)
The Colonndade Homes for sale wrote: Hey very nice weblog!! [More]
ASP.NET Password Strength Regular Expression (2)
movie wrote: Bryian it would very hard to remember these kind o� [More]
ASP-NET-4-URL-Routing-Default-Page (3)
Facebook Statuses wrote: I loved this article. It was so great. [More]
ASP NET Documentum Create operation failed for object (1)
Signature by david beckham 2 5 oz womens edt tester wrote: Where can i find your rss feed? [More]
How to get the date of a day of a given week number in a month? (2)
Facebook Statuses wrote: Great post! indeed! [More]